Evaluation of the relevance of the numerical simulaton approach for site effect estimation – lessons of the Euroseistest Verification and Validation Project (E2VP) – phase 1 and perspectives for phase 2
|
E. Maufroy
|
D3-38
|
|
Inventory of approaches to account for site effects: methodologies and regulations
|
C. Lacave, M. Koller
|
D3-39
|
|
Approaches to account for sites effects in the PSHA of selected sites in the Po area
|
R. Paolucci, E. Faccioli, C. Smerzini, M. Vanini
|
D3-96
|
|
Characterization of classes of sites with a large potential to cause site effects taking into account the geological heterogeneities (methodological approach)
|
P. Moczo
|
D3-97
|
|
Characterizing site metadata of accelerometric network stations: results and methodological feedback from a rap station survey
|
A. Dechamp, S. Thomassin, F. Hollender, C. Cornou
|
D3-115
|
|
Site instrumentation usefulness: example of application of empirical of site effect estimation in low seismicity context and implementation recommendations
|
V. Perron, F. Hollender, C. Guyonnet-Benaize
|
D3-116
|
|
3D ground motions simulations for site effects assessment : learnings from Euroseistest verification and validation projet
|
E. Maufroi (ISTerre), E. Chaljub, F. Hollender, P.Y. Bard, F. De Martin, Z. Roumelioti, N. Theodoulis, C. Guyonnet-Benaize, O. Ktenidou, V. Perron
|
D3-137
|
|
PRENOLIN: Results from the verification and validation phases and present recommendations for the use of non‐linear simulation
|
J. Régnier, F. Bonilla
|
D3-149
|
|
Correction of surface records of their site effect before developing GMPE: an alternative approach to get reference incident ground motion (application to KiK-net data)
|
F. Hollender , L. Foundotos, A. Laurendeau, PY. Bard
|
D3-150
|
|
Identification of key site features for site effect evaluation: extensive numerical sensitivity studies of sedimentary basin structures
|
J. Kristek, P. Moczo, P.-Y. Bard, F. Hollender, S. Stripajová, Z. Margočová, E. Chaljub, C. Durand
|
D3-151
|
|